Ratio of IPv4 and IPv6 hosts

Results can be filtered by the web site containing the 'web bug' counting hosts: (you must include the leading http://)
By using a specific trick (collecting IPv6 statistics about clients of some specific web servers), we counted 29 hosts (since midnight UTC):
  • 17 IPv4 only hosts;
  • 11 dual stack hosts where IPv6 is preferred (like Windows XP & Linux) or IPv6 only hosts;
  • 1 dual stack hosts where IPv4 is preferred (like Windows Vista);
Therefore 41.38% of Internet hosts are IPv6 enabled (not counting hosts with IPv6 enabled but without good IPv6 connectivity):
  • 11 host(s) with native IPv6 connectivity;
  • 0 host(s) using 6to4 tunnels (including 0 routers/home gateways);
  • 0 host(s) using ISATAP tunnels;
  • 1 host(s) using Teredo tunnels;
  • 0 Freebox(es).

Browsers and Operating Systems

Statistics about Windows 8 visitors (or do you want any type of addresses, only IPv4 or only IPv6 or only IPv6-preferred or only IPv4-preferred dual-stack or only Freebox IPv6 or only 6to4 IPv6 or only Teredo IPv6 or addresses? Or do you want only Windows XP or Windows Vista or Windows 7 or Windows 8 or Mac OS X or iOS machines?
Operating SystemCount
BrowserCount
CountryCount

Teredo Servers

FrequencyIPv4 Address of Teredo Server
1157.56.144.215 (157.56.144.215)

The last 10 accesses

DateIPv4IPv6RefererUser Agent
2018-01-21
05:33:26
CL190.16...http://www.wyzer.cl/zona/articulo/mikrotik101Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/63.0.3239.132 Safari/537.36
Mac OS X/Google Chrome
2018-01-21
05:03:46
USNative2602:47:da8f:3a0...https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/63.0.3239.132 Safari/537.36
Unknown/Google Chrome
2018-01-21
05:03:16
CHNative2a02:120b:2c21:4...Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:57.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/57.0
Unknown/Firefox
2018-01-21
04:50:22
TWNative2001:b011:6c07:b...https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/63.0.3239.132 Safari/537.36
Unknown/Google Chrome
2018-01-21
04:23:35
JP125.30...https://test4.vyncke.org/Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko
Windows 7/Unknown
2018-01-21
04:20:44
RU95.163...https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/dashboard.php?country=RU&lang=enMozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64; rv:53.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/53.0
Windows 8.1/Firefox
2018-01-21
04:07:23
US154.49...https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:57.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/57.0
Linux (unknown)/Firefox
2018-01-21
04:05:47
JPNative240b:10:a600:0:e...https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/dashboard.php?country=jp&lang=enMozilla/5.0 (Android 5.1.1; Tablet; rv:57.0) Gecko/57.0 Firefox/57.0
Android/Firefox
2018-01-21
03:47:12
US131.25...Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534+ (KHTML, like Gecko) BingPreview/1.0b
Windows 7/AppleWebKit
2018-01-21
03:12:18
CL191.11...http://www.wyzer.cl/zona/articulo/mejorarWiFiMozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/64.0.3282.99 Safari/537.36
Unknown/Google Chrome

The last 10 IPv6 accesses Windows 8 visitors

If an IPv4 address is displayed, this means that the host preferred to use IPv4 vs. IPv6; IPv6 is used only when it was explicitely redirected to http://[2001:...]/...
DateIPv4IPv6RefererUser Agent
2018-01-16
22:31:18
USNative2001:470:99a4:0:...https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/dashboard.php?country=RU&lang=enMozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/60.0.3112.78 Safari/537.36
Windows 8/Google Chrome
2018-01-15
13:17:40
Native2a07:4dc0:4ed:a2...http://www.vyncke.org/Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; Win64; x64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0
Windows 8/Firefox

Historical Data for all sites

OS with IPv6

OS% of IPv6-able Error grouping IPv6 hosts:Expression #3 of SELECT list is not in GROUP BY clause and contains nonaggregated column 'count.countv6_os.os_mobile' which is not functionally dependent on columns in GROUP BY clause; this is incompatible with sql_mode=only_full_group_by