Ratio of IPv4 and IPv6 hosts

Results can be filtered by the web site containing the 'web bug' counting hosts: (you must include the leading http://)
By using a specific trick (collecting IPv6 statistics about clients of some specific web servers), we counted 24 hosts (since midnight UTC):
  • 16 IPv4 only hosts;
  • 8 dual stack hosts where IPv6 is preferred (like Windows XP & Linux) or IPv6 only hosts;
  • 0 dual stack hosts where IPv4 is preferred (like Windows Vista);
Therefore 33.33% of Internet hosts are IPv6 enabled (not counting hosts with IPv6 enabled but without good IPv6 connectivity):
  • 8 host(s) with native IPv6 connectivity;
  • 0 host(s) using 6to4 tunnels (including 0 routers/home gateways);
  • 0 host(s) using ISATAP tunnels;
  • 0 host(s) using Teredo tunnels;
  • 0 Freebox(es).

Browsers and Operating Systems

Statistics about 6to4 tunnel visitors (or do you want any type of addresses, only IPv4 or only IPv6 or only IPv6-preferred or only IPv4-preferred dual-stack or only Freebox IPv6 or only 6to4 IPv6 or only Teredo IPv6 or addresses? Or do you want only Windows XP or Windows Vista or Windows 7 or Windows 8 or Mac OS X or iOS machines?
Operating SystemCount
BrowserCount
CountryCount

Teredo Servers

FrequencyIPv4 Address of Teredo Server

The last 10 accesses

DateIPv4IPv6RefererUser Agent
2018-08-18
06:43:47		CO186.18...https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/project.phpMozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:61.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/61.0
Unknown/Firefox
2018-08-18
06:11:54		MYNative2001:e68:4054:96...https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/detailed.php?country=myMozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/68.0.3440.106 Safari/537.36
Unknown/Google Chrome
2018-08-18
05:32:11		CL191.11...Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_4) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/68.0.3440.106 Safari/537.36
Mac OS X/Google Chrome
2018-08-18
04:57:01		CN106.12...http://vyncke.org/Sogou web spider/4.0(+http://www.sogou.com/docs/help/webmasters.htm#07)
Unknown/Unknown
2018-08-18
04:47:01		USNative2001:19f0:9002:a...http://ipv6.test-ipv6.se/Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/68.0.3440.75 Safari/537.36
Linux (unknown)/Google Chrome
2018-08-18
04:38:38		CN183.13...http://www.swm.pp.se/Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 9_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/601.1.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/9.0 Mobile/13B143 Safari/601.1
iPad/Apple Safari
2018-08-18
04:34:02		CN58.19....http://test-ipv6.se/Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/68.0.3440.106 Safari/537.36
Windows 7/Google Chrome
2018-08-18
04:27:35		JP202.21...https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/compare.php?metric=p&countries=jp,wwMozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:62.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/62.0
Unknown/Firefox
2018-08-18
04:24:32		CN183.11...http://swm.pp.se/Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36
Unknown/Google Chrome
2018-08-18
03:34:10		CN111.20...http://dual.tlund.se/Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Baiduspider-render/2.0; +http://www.baidu.com/search/spider.html)
Spider/Spider

The last 10 IPv6 accesses 6to4 tunnel visitors

If an IPv4 address is displayed, this means that the host preferred to use IPv4 vs. IPv6; IPv6 is used only when it was explicitely redirected to http://[2001:...]/...
DateIPv4IPv6RefererUser Agent
2018-08-13
16:57:14		DE91.54....2002:5b36:987:0:...
6to4 Router		http://ipv6.tlund.se/Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:61.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/61.0
Windows 7/Firefox
2018-08-12
20:25:32		DE91.54....2002:5b36:b4d:0:...
6to4 Router		http://ipv6.tlund.se/Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:61.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/61.0
Windows 7/Firefox
2018-08-11
00:18:07		DE213.23...2002:5863:7692::...http://www.host-4u.co.uk/Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) PhantomJS/2.1.1 Safari/538.1
Windows 8/Apple Safari

Historical Data for all sites

OS with IPv6

OS% of IPv6-able Error grouping IPv6 hosts:Expression #3 of SELECT list is not in GROUP BY clause and contains nonaggregated column 'count.countv6_os.os_mobile' which is not functionally dependent on columns in GROUP BY clause; this is incompatible with sql_mode=only_full_group_by